June 2006 - Posts

Loaded Touring with the Kogswell P/R Prototype

The Kogswell Porteur/Randonneur (aka Kogswell P/R) is getting a lot of buzz in online forums as an exciting new bike.  The most interesting this about this bike is not the weird wheel size (584mm aka 650B), or being the first TIG welded Kogswell, or the fact that it fits wide tires.  The most interesting thing about this bike is that uses a low trail steering geometry.  Just to give customers many options Kogswell is selling the bike with three different forks to allow the customer to tailor the steering geometry and handling of the bike to their needs.

Jan Heine, Mark Vande Kamp and I evaluated the handling differences of the three different forks for Vintage Bicycle Quarterly in Volume 4, Number 3.  As a result of that testing I found that I preferred the fork with 40mm of trail.  It works well unloaded or with a light rear load and best with a front load.

This was a difficult trip for me to pack for.  I was planning on riding the Vancouver Island logging roads with stretches as long as 3 days between towns, so I knew I couldn't go ultralight.  I also was carrying a 5.5lb tent for two instead of the 1.5lb hammock that I'd carry if I was riding solo.  While touring I like to use my Cobbworks Oyster Bucket panniers even though they are a little bit heavy because they are waterproof and make great stools in camp or at rest stops.

While planning for this trip I knew that the bike would do best with a front load, but I also wanted to get away with carrying only two panniers and the buckets work best on the rear.  As a result my original load looked like this:


Rear Heavy Load (photo by John Speare)

I put most of my food into the front handlebar bag, clothing into one rear bucket, the stove and a few misc items into the other bucket, and my tent, sleeping bag, and sleeping pad on top.  I did not weigh my gear before leaving but I'd guess that I had about 25# on the rear of the bike and 10# on the front.  Lifting the bike made it obvious that there was a heavy rear bias.

It was clear from the first ride around the ferry terminal parking lot (and sadly 3 hours from home) that this was not the ideal setup.  The rear load made the front of the bike too light and the bike would easily shimmy.  Larry (a touring partner) pointed out that my buckets were located behind the rear axle, so I slid them as far forward as possible and this helped a great deal, but the handling was still not very good.

That night I thought about how to fix the bicycle's handling.  I knew that I needed to get a front rack, but I didn't think that putting the buckets on a lowrider rack would leave me with the necessary bag capacity.  I still needed somewhere to put my tent, sleeping bag, and pad.  I considered using compression straps to fasten those to the rear rack, but decided that I ultimately needed to get some panniers for the front.  The Ortlieb Backrollers that I use for commuting were on their way out anyway (after 10 years of daily use), so I decided to purchase a new pair.

The next morning I visited some bike shops in Victoria, BC and purchased a pair of panniers for the front and a lowrider front rack.  I moved everything that was strapped down to the rear rack to the front along with a few items from my buckets.  It was obvious from my first lifting of the bike that the weight distribution was much better.

This is what the bike looked like with the new gear:


Balanced Load (photo by John Speare)

It was clear that the handling was much better even after a couple of miles.  Lesson learned, low trail really does mean having a front or balanced load.

Once properly loaded the Kogswell P/R worked nicely as a loaded tourer.  This bike was designed around wide tires and I ran it with the 36mm wide Panaracer CdlV.  This tire worked very well on pavement, crushed limestone trails, and dirt logging roads.  Even with a heavy front load the bike was comfortable to ride all day, never fought me in the corners, and could be ridden no hands for short periods.

My bike is a prototype and the list of brazeons differ from the production bikes.  The prototype had almost everything that I'd want for touring, but I'd still let to see a few additions.  The highest priority would be having a third waterbottle cage location mounted under the downtube.  Two bottles of water is good, but three is even better.  My prototype didn't come with mid-fork brazeons for a front lowrider, but I know that they have been added to the production frames.  Otherwise the bike has everything necessary for loaded touring.

On my next trip I think I'll concentrate on having a load biased towards this front.  This will probably mean using the same handlebar bag, two buckets mounted on front lowriders, and a large saddlebag in the rear with no rear rack.  I think that this would have provided the capacity needed for this trip while optimizing the load balance for this bike.  For an overnight trip I would probably use only a handlebar bag and two small front panniers.

When I sold my previous loaded touring bike I was wondering if I made a mistake in assuming that the Kogswell P/R would be up to this sort of use.  After 5 days on the road I'm here to report that it is, as long as you are careful to put at least half of your touring load up front.  The bike really is a joy to ride when well loaded and I hope to use it on many trips to come.

Gear Review: Ostrich Handlebar Bag and Velo Orange Decaleur

Introduction

The Ostrich F104 is a French-style handlebar bag made of cotton duck.  It is designed to mount to the handlebars, but have it's weight supported from the bottom by a front rack.  I've used it with the Nitto Campee (sold by Rivendell as the Nitto Mini) and Nitto M12, but it would work with any front rack that has a top shelf.  Normally the bag is secured to the handlebars with two leather straps, but Velo Orange makes a quick release device that will support the bag instead.


The front support rack and the bike-half of the Velo Orange Decaleur

This setup is quite different than most handlebar bags, but it has some big advantages.  Most handlebar bags use a quick release clamp which mounts to the handlebars and which supports the entire load only from the bars.  In comparison this bag is mounted lower on the front of the bike, which both improves handling and prevents the bag from blocking handlebar mounted accessories.  The use of a front rack to support the load from the bottom allows for a heavier load than most bags can handle.

Bag Design and Use


The rear and side bag pockets

The handlebar bag is quite large with a capacity of almost 13 liters.  It is almost a cube at 260mm (10 1/4") wide, 220mm (8 2/3") tall, and 200mm (8") deep.  There are 5 pockets in addition to the large main pocket.  The front of the bag has a wide and tall pocket that is about an inch deep that is useful for keeping small but important items like your sunglasses.  The rear of the bag has two small pockets.  I found that my wallet and cell phone fit perfectly into one of them and carried a small digital camera in the other.  There are two thin pockets on either side of the bag.  I carry a home made rain cover in one and left the other empty.  The front, rear, and main pockets all use elastic shock cord over a metal loop as a closure mechanism.  This is secure and yet very easy to open with a single hand.

At the top of the bag there is a map pocket.  The map pocket is completely open on each side (unlike my other handlebar bags) and has a 1cm grid on top which can be useful when making measurements on maps.  I didn't think I'd like the open sides and worried that my maps would shift or fly out while taking tight corners, but this has not been a problem.  I don't like the grid, in bright sunlight it projects grey lines onto the map which can look like roads.  I often found myself removing the map from the case to read it while riding due to this issue.


Top flap opened

One concern on the BOB and Kogswell lists is that the main flap on this bag opens backwards.  The closure is on the front of the bag (facing away from the rider) instead of the back of the bag.  I can reach the closure while riding to open the bag, but it requires more of a reach than other handlebar bags that I've used.  On the other hand the elastic shock cord is easier to work with than the zippers or snaps on my other handlebar bags, so this makes up for having to reach farther.  Once opened there isn't really a downside to having the bag open the wrong way.  I don't ride brevets or other timed events, so I usually accessed the bag while I was stopped anyway.  If I did need to access the bag while riding I would probably keep food and other fast access items in the side and rear pockets.

As I mentioned earlier this is a very large handlebar bag.  At 12 liters it has the same volume as one of my Ortlieb small front panniers.  On my first ride with this bag I was able to fit a box of cereal, a large bag of musliex, a full change of clothes, my tools, and a bicycle lock.  I do not have a problem carrying my normal commute load (change of clothes, maybe lunch, and tools) and usually have space left over (unfortunately it will not fit my laptop).  While touring I  could carry a many day food supply in it in addition to my wallet, phone, camera, sunglasses, passport, and book.

I used the handlebar bag exclusively with the Velo Orange Decaleur, but it came with straps for securing the bag directly to the handlebars and the top of the rack.  The handlebar straps would only be useful if your rack to handlebar height matched that of this bag.  I didn't find the under the bag strap to be useful at all, it was turned the wrong way to work with my Nitto front racks and hard to reach to secure it anyway.  I think it would be more useful if turned 90 degrees and located at the front edge of the bag instead of in the center.


The loop under the bag is not well located and is oriented the wrong way to be useful

Stylistically I like the design of the bag.  It has leather only where it provides function and is otherwise made of cotton duck.  There are internal stiffener plates for the sides and bottom to maintain the bags shape, but they can easily be removed for packing.

Decaleur Use

The decaleur is an optional item, but should be purchased with this bag.  It makes installing and removing the bag trivial.  Instead of strapping it to your handlebars you just lower the bag onto the decaleur and front rack.

The decaleur consists of two parts, both made of stainless steel.  The first part fits into your headset stack and consists of a U shaped piece of metal with two downward facing tubes.  The second part mounts to the bag and has two prongs which face downwards and fit into the tubes on the bike portion of the decaleur.  Each part is available seperately, so you can buy one of the bike parts for each bike that you own and one of the bag parts for each of your handlebar bags if you want to move things around easily.  You do need to mount the decaleur at roughly the same height (within a cm or so) above the front rack on each of your bikes.  These photos show the decaleur mounted on a bike with a 1 1/8" threadless headset, but they also make the bike portion for 1" threaded headsets.

For road riding the decaleur by itself is all that you need to secure the bag to the bike.  Just align the bike and bag portions of the decaleur and drop the bag onto the rack.  When you need to remove it (to go shopping for instance) you just lift the whole thing off of the rack and go on your way.  It couldn't get much easier.  Over large bumps the bag might bounce a little bit, but never high enough to clear the decaleur.

While touring on logging roads I found that it wasn't quite secure enough.  I hit a pothole while descending and the bag bounced off of the front rack and out of the decaleur.  I found that a velcro strap between each part of the decaleur was enough to keep this from happening, but it made installing the bag take longer.  It would be nice to see the decaleur redesigned to have a positive locking mechanism.  An easy running change would be to use longer prongs on the bag part of the decaleur with a hole drilled across the bottom of them.  A small pin or spring clip could be installed the lock the bag to the bike.  Hopefully Velo Orange considers doing this in a future production run.


Securing the Decaleur with a compression or velcro strap

Compared to a front basket

I've been using a Wald basket on the front of my bike prior to getting the Ostrich bag.  A couple of cyclists have asked me how they compare.

I think I'll keep using both.  The basket is ideal for bulky or oddly shaped loads such as groceries, large boxes, and bicycle tires.  The basket does not carry small items such as keys or even gloves very well because they can fall through the open bottom.  The handlebar bag is much more useful for carrying gear, but not as useful for riding.

The ideal solution would be a basket which worked with the decaleur.  This would make it easy to use the handlebar bag for touring and longer rides and switch to a basket for shopping or packages which are too large to fit into the handlebar bag.  I may modify my Wald basket to work with this system.

How I tested and limitations in my testing

I'm writing this review in late June after having owned this bag for about two weeks.  In that time I've used it for about 75 miles of commuting as my only on-bike storage and for about 150 miles of loaded touring while also carrying four panniers.

While commuting I typically put stuff that I needed to reach (keys, my bus pass, maybe a book or MP3 player for the bus ride) in outside pockets and used the main pocket for a change of clothes, breakfast or lunch.  I carried tools in the flat side pockets.  While touring I used the rear pockets to hold my phone, camera, and wallet, the front pocket to hold my sunglasses, a side pocket for a rain cover, and the main pocket for food, a book, and a long sleeved shirt.  I've ridden with the bag carrying loads of almost no weight up to about 6.5kg (15 pounds).

I did not encounter any rain during the review period, so I can't comment on how this bag would fair in poor weather.  I did make a simple raincover for it (and I understand that Velo Orange will offer one soon) in case of rain.  I don't think that the bag would hold up to heavy rain very well without a rain cover.  The cotton duck doesn't seem to be waxed, the cover does not protect the sides of the bag at all, and the map case is completely open on the sides.

Conclusion

The Ostrich F104, Velo Orange Decaleur, and a front rack of your choice provide a great way to carry a light to moderately heavy load up front.  They provide an accessible load with plenty of capacity (both in weight and volume) which is easy to install and remove from the bike.  I expect to use this system, or something very similar to it, for a long time to come.

The bag could use a few minor tweaks.  The bottom strap is not well placed (at least for my Nitto front racks) and is thus useless.  It would probably be nicer if the lid opened in the other direction, but this is not critical.  The map case should not have any gridlines.  It would be nice if bag was designed for greater weather resistance.  All of these concerns are fairly minor and should not prevent one from buying it.

The decaleur does what it was intended to do extremely well.  I'd like to see a built in method of locking the bag to the bike, but there are suitable workarounds and securing the bag this way is only necessary on the roughest roads.

There is not much competition out there for bags which use this mounting system or provide this capacity and the Ostrich bag and Velo Orange decaleur are both very well priced compared to what else is out there.  If you are considering a front handlebar bag in this style it is hard to go wrong with this solution.

You can buy the decaleur today at Velo Orange and they should be getting the bags in soon.  I also have larger and more photos of this bag on the bike photo section of my website.

Our new tandem


click for more photos

About three months ago I made a deal with a bike shop owning friend to trade in our RANS Screamer recumbent tandem for an upright Burley tandem.  I really liked the Screamer for long rides, but I wasn't as comfortable riding it on shorter rides in the city.  Almost all of our rides are shorter rides in the city, so the Screamer didn't make a lot of sense.  As a bonus the new owner of the Screamer is also my regular touring buddy and so if I ever want to use the Screamer for touring again it won't be far away.

I originally thought I'd get a Burley Duet which is a very nice steel road tandem.  The problem with the Duet is that it doesn't take wheels with tires over about 35mm wide (or even skinnier with fenders).  Fenders are must for me and I like to find dirt trails, so wider tires were also necessary.  We decided on getting the Rock and Roll which is their nicer "mountain" tandem and converting it to drop bars.  This is exactly what we did with our first tandem, a Cannondale MT1000.

The Burley Rock and Roll comes stock in black or yellow, neither of which was very exciting for us.  We decided to upgrade to a stock color and after a bunch of looking ended up going with "Celestial Blue".  This is a nice medium blue with a hint of sparkle in the paint.

The tandem was ordered and scheduled to arrive in about 6 weeks (the long delay was due to the custom paint).  6 weeks came and went and I finally got a call late last week saying that the tandem had arrived.  On Sunday I headed down to Olympia to pick it up (and play some bike polo).  During the evenings this week I swapped out parts and built it up.

There were a few build challenges, but the bike has come together nicely.  Stock the tandem came with a rear disk brake.  This has caused a few issues: the disk brake caliper is setup for mountain bike brake levers and it sits right in the way of a rear rack.  I solved the rear rack problem by drilling a new mounting hole in our rack that lets it sit a little lower.  This opens up the space a bit where the disk brake caliper sits, and gives it just enough room to fit.  The only downside is that it doesn't leave enough space for our Burley trailer hitch.

I temporarily made the disk brake caliper compatible with drop bar levers by using a Sidetrak BPB.  That is the device sitting right in front of the disk caliper.  It is a simple lever that turns a small amount of cable pull into a large amount of cable pull.  The BPB does the job but is ugly and cumbersome, so I have a new disk brake caliper on order that is designed to work with drop bar levers.

Everything else on the bike went together smoothly.  I mounted a Nitto Mini front rack for holding a handlebar bag and that works great.  I was hoping to be able to use a Nitto M12 front rack because that model mounts to the cantilever studs, but it didn't fit on this fork.  The Nitto Mini uses clamps that are a little ugly, but the black clamps disappear into the black fork and the final result looks good. 

We took the bike on it's inaugural ride yesterday down to the U District Farmer's Market and the Fremont Solstice Parade.  The bike rides great and will meet our needs wonderfully.

Parts list for the other bike geeks out there:

  • Wheels - Shimano HF08 (XT) tandem hubs, Sun Rhyno Lite rims, Schwable Marathon 26x1.5" tires
  • Captain's handlebars - Nitto Noodle 46cm, Dimension high rise 120mm stem, Tektro brake levers, Shimano Dura/Ace 9sp barend shifters
  • Stoker's handlebars - Nitto Dove, Rivendell cork grips, Burley stoker stem, and unused brake/shift levers (we're borrowing this setup from Christine's single bike to see how the setup works on the tandem).
  • Captain's seatpost and saddle - Ritchey Logic 29.8mm and Brooks B17
  • Stoker's seatpost and saddle - Thudbuster ST.  The saddle is a work in progress.
  • Drivetrain - Shimano 9sp front derailleur (whatever came with the bike), XT rear derailleur
  • Cranks - Thorn tandem cranks, 170mm front, 165mm rear, 50/38/24 chainrings, 42 timing rings
  • Front rack - Nitto Mini
  • Rear rack - Tubus Vega
  • Front brake - Suntour XC Pro
  • Rear brake - Avid BB7 Mtn with Sidetrak BPB, 203mm disk

alex

 

Shi Shi Beach hiking trip

Two weekends ago I went on a 3 day road and backpacking trip with my friend David.  I've known him longer than anyone who isn't a family member and we've been great friends for almost all of that time.  He had some time off and we decided to do a trip together on the Olympic Peninsula.  We try to do something like this every few years.

The weather was looking super iffy on the morning of June 2nd and we spent most of it looking at weather reports and wondering if we should head east (away from rain) instead of going west (into it).  Finally we gave in and decided to ignore the weather reports and head west.  Like many great trips we kicked it off with a large meal and hit an Ethopian Resturant on the way out of town.  During lunch the rain slowed down and things started to look better.

We had good ferry Karma and arrived at the Edmonds/Kingston ferry with no wait time for a ferry plus getting loaded onto one of the first lanes to be unloaded.  The drive to Port Angeles was uneventful except for me making a wrong turn where we drove a 40 minute loop around the Port Gamble Indian Reservation (and yes, there is a casino in Port Gamble) before popping out exactly where we started and getting back on track.

In Port Angeles we arrived at the ranger station 2 minutes too late to get a bear canister, but the ranger told us we wouldn't need one for our first night, and we figured we wouldn't have any food left by the second night.  As the day turned into evening we realized that we had no flashlight and found a open hardware store to buy one, then headed up into the park to go to Olympic Hot Springs.


Passing Lake Mills on the way to the Hot Springs

The trail into the Hot Springs was an old road so the hiking was super easy.  We saw a few other groups coming out of the hot springs and an abandoned biking bottom of the side of the trail, but not much else on the hike in.  We went to the campground first and setup our stuff, then went down and found the pools themselves.

The hotsprings were okay, but not great.  They have higher algae growth than most springs that I've been too, and someone seems to think that using old car floor matts is an appropriate way to seal up the pools.  I found it kind of disgusting, but I've also been spoiled by the wonderful hotsprings along highway 12 in the Idaho panhandle.  David loves the springs and spent more time in them.  We had some great conversations about how to best design a house that he is building and what the world will be like after peak oil.

While the hotsprings were lackluster the campground was great.  It was mostly empty (only one other group was there), had bear wires for storing food, and the campsites were set pretty far apart and were flat.  The only other people camping there were a little strange and very drunk and disappeared (while leaving their fire going) shortly after we got there.  We shared a couple of beers and a little food and went to bed.

The next morning we headed out an on the road to Neah Bay to find Shi Shi beach.

Getting to Shi Shi beach is an adventure.  It is a roughly 4 hour drive plus ferry ride from Seattle.  In the last two hours of the drive (from Port Angeles) you'll only pass through two communities before Neah Bay and both are very small with limited services.  The scenery is nice though, and that is what really matters.

Once at Neah Bay you need to jump through a few hoops to get to Shi Shi beach.  You need to pick up a Recreation Pass ($10) at one of a number of businesses in town.  This pays for the trail to the beach.  If you are with David you also need to find some fish for dinner.  We asked around before finally being pointed to the fish processing dock and David walked down and was able to buy a full salmon, right off of the boat, for $5.  $5, for a ~5lb fish.  $1/lb for stuff that costs $20/lb back in Seattle.  The day was looking up.

We arrived at the trailhead to discover a couple of rangers and a police officer looking at two trashed cars.  They told us to park at the private parking lots (someone's front lawn) a 1/2 mile back up the road.  This cost another $10, but that is part of the Shi Shi adventure.  You need to pay three people to get there -- an Olympic National Park backcountry pass, the Makah Indian Reservation for trail work, and a private individual for parking so that your car isn't broken into.  Did we really want to go here that badly?

We did.


A cool tree along the Shi Shi beach trail

We loaded up our stuff and headed in.  Since we didn't have a bear canister we only brought food for that night and thought we'd find a nice breakfast in the morning elsewhere.  The trail in started pretty nicely, it was mostly boardwalk and turnpike along some second and third growth forest.  After about a mile it turned into a trek through the mud in second growth forest.  The only people that we saw on the trail were a couple of rangers who passed us (going into the beach) and a odd woman walking very fast away from the beach who asked us if the wild raspberries were poisionous.

At the end of the trail we found a steep bluff down to the beach and the rangers were talking to a large group about their camping situation.  We passed through and broke out of the woods onto the beach.


Shi Shi Beach, looking North

What a beach.  There are large sea stacks at the points on either end of the beach.  The beach is about 2 miles long and has streams coming across it in about 4 places.  The stacks at the south of the of beach are called the Point of Arches and there are 3 arches that you can see through as you approach them. 

We walked about half a mile down the beach, setup camp, and had some dinner.  The fish was awesome:


Grilling salmon in the fire

I've only recently started eating fish (after 15 years of being a strict lacto-ovo vegetarian) and this was the best that I've had so far.  I expect that the setting, being hungry, and the freshness had a lot to do with that. 

After eating about 2lbs of salmon and an ear of corn each we walked down to the end of the beach and back.  The area around the Point of Arches was the most interesting and we waited there for sunset:


Sunset over the Point of Arches

Any thoughts of skipping this trip due to rain were clearly unfounded.  The weather was wonderful and this might have been one of my more memorable sunsets (especially in Washington State).   On the walk back up the sunset just got better and better.


We got back to our camp at dusk, restarted our fire, moved it a little bit closer to our sitting rock, and sat back and relaxed. What a wonderful weekend.  I hope to make it back another time.


Relaxing by the fire

The rest of the photos.

Big box, small basket

If Keith Gilstrap is reading this, that box contains your moustache bars.

Baskets are great.  I would have needed my trailer to carry this if I didn't have the front basket.  I could have strapped it down to the rear rack, but I woudn't have been able to see it and make sure that it wasn't falling off.

The large box was just secured with a cargo net.

More Posts